They contains five things: positive care values (“Alarming assists me to stop issues later”), values regarding uncontrollability and you can danger (“My personal alarming is actually unsafe for me personally”), cognitive ability (“We have little count on in my memories to own words and you can brands”), general bad philosophy (“Basically failed to manage a distressing envision, after which it simply happened, it could be my blame”), and you will intellectual self-awareness (“I do believe a great deal regarding my personal opinion”). The latest metacognition questionnaire are scored from inside the a good cuatro point size from 1 (“do not agree”) so you’re able to 4 (“consent definitely”) along with an effective Chronbach’s leader = .88. The metacognition questionnaire has been used extensively inside non-clinical products such as cigarette smokers and you will people [44, 45]. A complete get is computed to form a list from metacognition per participant.
The brand new Fanatical-Compulsive Collection is actually good 42-goods thinking-report questionnaire, examining the severity of various obsessions and you can compulsions away from OCD inside adults . The fresh new fanatical-compulsive inventory include eight subscales that come with washing (“We tidy my personal give more often otherwise more than requisite”), checking (“I go back into towns and cities in order for I have maybe not hurt anybody”), doubting (“Whether or not I really do some thing meticulously I’m which isn’t a bit best”), purchasing (“I get disappointed in the event the anyone else provides altered how i possess developed my personal some thing”), obsessing (“I have found it difficult to deal with my personal thoughts”), hoarding (“I assemble something I do not you want”), and you will neutralising (“Personally i think I want to recite particular numbers”). That escort Coral Springs it list is scored with the an effective cuatro point Likert level, from 1 (“definitely not”) in order to cuatro (“extremely”) along with a beneficial Chronbach’s alpha = .88. A total rating was computed to form you to get per fellow member pertaining to O-C attacks.
Chances attempt of students took part in the analysis. Professionals have been to start with offered factual statements about the research and offered the opportunity to ask questions about any of it. Immediately following offering consent, for each new member offered demographic information, and have been presented with the latest four questionnaires into the an excellent counterbalanced buy to respond to during the their own time. If participant finished they are thanked and you can debriefed. Most of the information and procedures used the ethical advice and functions detail by detail of the Western Mental Connection and you can had been searched and you will accepted of the College from Hertfordshire integrity committee (Number:14149216).
Analysis try processed to possess lost philosophy, outliers and presumptions away from statistical study before any data . All of the details had acceptable opinions to own skewness and you will kurtosis and no extreme outliers. Bivariate correlations of one’s an incredible number of the computed spiders revealed self-confident and you can extreme relationships among them (Dining table step 1). The best association was involving the spiders off condition and you will trait stress, with the fresh new relationship ranging from nervousness susceptibility, metacognition and you can O-C symptoms.
Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].
In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.